.jpg)
A beautiful late June Monday in an Episcopal parish in a college town is almost guaranteed to be a slow day...a good day to schedule a doctor's appointment, which is exactly what I had done four months earlier. I'd come into the office that morning, after working online from home, in order to keep a phone appointment with the Archdeacon and planned then to scoot off to keep my appointment. "I'll see you after lunch," I told the Parish Administrator as I slipped out her dutch door. She gestured to the waiting room and whispered "Someone from the Food Pantry to see you - about a baptism."
"Grrr," I thought. "I'll be late; and the doctor's office had said to come early to update my records." So I didn't even sit down with the two men in the waiting area, hoping not to seem too rude but not wanting to be delayed either. They were Vietnamese I reckoned, and we immediately encountered language difficulties, which my haste did not help. I finally got an approximation of the older fellow's name, Hue, and we agreed that they would return the next day when I could give them some time.
The next day and the appointed time came, and an entire family appeared: Hue and his companion from the day before who functioned as a sort of language facilitator, plus Hue's wife and daughter, and a new-born babe-in-arms with a headful of jet black hair. I invited them in and they proceeded to get to the point.
"Baby baptized..." was the purpose of their visit. Would I baptize the child? In my mind I reviewed the usual drill I go through when asked that question, which oftentimes comes over the telephone or by email. These folks are unknown to me and I don't know their motivation - are they practicing Christians? Why do they want the baby baptized? What do they understand baptism to be about? Are they prepared to follow through on the baptismal promises? How might we undertake baptismal instruction for someone with the language difficulties we were having in this very conversation? And, how difficult would it be for this family to integrate into the congregation if we proceeded with baptism - we do best at welcoming and incorporating folks who are pretty much just like us, and Hue and his family certainly had their differences.
"Are you Christian?" I asked. "Yes," Hue replied with certainty, and he flipped open a three-ring binder he had placed on the conference table. I could see neatly punched green cards, and various other documents as he flipped through. Finally he handed me a well-used coarse paper booklet which looked much like the inexpensive Mass booklets I have seen in Roman Catholic churches, with a graphic of the Holy Family on the cover. The writing might have been Vietnamese, but the only word I recognized for certain was "Imprimatur" inside the front cover. Seizing on that I asked, "Are you a Roman Catholic?" To which question he gave me a puzzled look.
"Are you Catholic?" I repeated, which got the same puzzled expression. "Do you go to church?" I asked, trying a different tack. "Yes," Hue smiled, gesturing seriously with his right hand in a direction beyond my left shoulder, "St. Mary."
"You go to St. Mary's Cathedral? You are Catholic?" "Yes," he replied. "And I want to have my baby baptized." His language facilitator and his wife nodded emphatically. "Have you asked at St. Mary's about baptism?" I asked. "Yes" came the reply, and then the zinger, "And they want me to take classes. Classes are at night, when I work. My wife has not good English. We cannot do classes."
Busted. I mean, what he said was reasonable. In the Episcopal Church we require baptismal instruction as well - maybe not classes, but instruction of parents and godparents. And if language is a problem, or scheduling, then pastorally we work that out - we don't do so many baptisms that we can't adjust to individual circumstances. If this family were in my parish I would figure out a way to work around work schedules and language difficulties.
But they weren't and so I had to explain that they needed to stick with what St. Mary's told them.
So I tried to talk about the difference between churches (and boundaries between them). The more I tried to explain the more foolish I sounded to myself and the less sense I made to Hue, I'm sure. How do you explain the Reformation, denominationalism and the fact that because he is a member of St. Mary's Cathedral and a Roman Catholic I really can't help him go around his own church's discipline? And the thought - which usually comes when I'm talking with Roman Catholics who have a divorce in the background and want to remarry but not to leave their church, and come to me "just" to get married because they can't get married in their own church - came to mind here: "Why do I always have to be the one to explain the discipline of the Roman Catholic Church!" And then, "Because I don't think they'd do the same for me."
But I digress.
Hue listened to my attempts at explanation and then asked, "Do you have Jesus?" and pointed up in the air. "Yes," I replied, "we have Jesus." "Do you have Mary?" came the the follow-up. "Yes," I said with Anglican roominess, "we honor the Virgin Mary." "Do you have Mass?" he continued? "Yes, we have the Eucharist," I affirmed. "Do you have baptism?" "Yes, I replied, "we have baptism." "Can I have my baby baptized here?" It was a simple enough question on his part. "I cannot baptize your baby because you are members of another church and I cannot help you break the rules of your church," was my less than simple response.
He was silent for a moment and then it appeared he accepted this (which is not the same as saying he understood it) and spoke some more about classes when he worked at night and his wife's difficulty with English. And as he began to fold up his papers to leave, I remembered another time I had refused to baptize an infant. In that instance it was not the parents who wanted the infant baptized but a great grandmother who wanted a family tradition maintained. The bishop had suggested a compromise that worked for me and the parents (but not the great grandmother) and I offered that now to this family.
"I can say some prayers for your baby, and give him a blessing. Would you like me to do that, even if I can't baptized him?" Hue looked a little puzzled by this, but after some consideration agreed. I took them all into our chapel, sat them down, and went to get my vestments. I returned in alb and stole, and prayed from the service of Thanksgiving for the Birth of a Child, using as a reading the words of Mary in the Magnificat. And I added a few extra signs of the cross, and for good measure when we got to the prayer "for a child not yet baptized" I annointed their child with oil for protection.
They seemed OK with this, and I was trying to convince myself that I had done what I could do. After the final prayer we smiled and shook hands and bowed to one another, and in some brief chatting and smiling over the baby Hue asked when our Masses were. I told him it was summer and we had only one service on Sundays, at 9am. He thanked me again, there was another round of nodding to one another, and they bundled up the baby and left through the garden.
The following Sunday as I went from making pre-service announcements at the front of the church to the rear to begin the formal entrance procession, I saw Hue and his language facilitator there in the pew. He had a very serious look on his face; but when I nodded and smiled, the young companion smiled in return.
On February 2nd the Liturgical Calendar invites us to celebrate that time in salvation history when Joseph brought Mary and her child Jesus to the Temple, to do what their religious system required of them (Luke 2:22-38). We used to call this The Feast of the Purification of the Blessed Virgin but now more commonly it is known as The Feast of the Presentation of Christ in the Temple, shifting the emphasis from Mary to Jesus. I've thought of that visit several times since Hue and his family visited St. John's. And I've thought about the ways in which we always need to be sure it is in fact Jesus who is the focus of our attention, not someone or something else. I'm not against discipline or procedures, please don't misunderstand. But out here "in the field" discretion and gut judgment are good things too. On that Monday morning, I hope they were in balance.
In any case - and maybe it doesn't really matter in the end - I believe that one Monday in late June of this year the Holy Family visited St. John's as quietly and simply as they visited the Temple that day in Jerusalem. And what really matters is that they were recognized.
Better late than never.